Report 3 - Executive Summary
Prioritisation Methodology
This document, which was prepared for EcoWater by Montgomery Watson and
Project Management, outlines a methodology for prioritising stormwater
catchments for the purpose of managing a wide range of stormwater issues in a
focussed and integrated manner.
It is divided into three major sections:
- Part A - Introduction and Rationale; which outlines context and the
reasons for prioritising stormwater catchments
- Part B - Prioritisation Methodology Statement; which details a
methodology and the steps required to carry out prioritisation of stormwater
catchments
- Part C - Prioritisation Methodology Application: System and Process;
which documents Waitakere City Council's application of the methodology and
contains the various outputs of each step of the prioritisation process,
including the Waitakere City Catchment priorities
Part A looks at the combined efforts of territorial authorities and
the Auckland Regional Council in producing an urban stormwater strategy to
improve stormwater management in urban areas. It also looks at Waitakere City
Council's holistic approach and philosophy for developing a stormwater strategy,
which fits into the wider context of strategic planning for the City.
The rationale for prioritising stormwater catchments is explored, and why
territorial authorities should ensure that this approach is used when preparing
and implementing strategic, asset and district planning.
Part B provides an example of the steps required to carry out
stormwater prioritisation in any given locality. It shows how to get started,
i.e. developing and documenting a 'Terms of Reference', creating a catchment
plan, carrying out preliminary information gathering and the importance of
holding stakeholder workshops.
Catchment issues are covered from assessing land use activities,
topographical and geological characteristics, identifying issues and sub-issues
within a given study area, to gathering and recording specific information and
data for later scoring. Assessing and recording the receiving environment
condition of both freshwater and marine areas are covered in some depth.
Receiving Environment community values, could cover the assessment of
recreational activities, food gathering, cultural and historic considerations,
the aesthetics and locality of an area and any commercial activities which may
affect an areas value.
A methodology for catchment assessment is described, which rates catchment
issues, receiving environment condition and receiving environment community
values from extremely high to nil. This is followed by a catchment ranking
process. These rankings are then utilised to build scenarios, which encompass
the critical issues that require addressing. Local authority politicians are
then engaged in the process to determine the preferred scenarios, and hence the
catchment priorities.
Part C looks at how Waitakere City prioritised its 28 stormwater
catchments, using the methodology outlined in Part B.
An agenda item was presented to Waitakere City Council outlining the
stormwater implementation scenarios and associated information. The scenarios
involved addressing:
- public health, development and safety issues; and then, either:
- remaining flooding priorities: giving priority to solving the City's
flooding problems over the next ten years or so; or
- high quality receiving environment catchments: giving priority to
protecting the City's catchments with existing relatively high quality
receiving environment from further degradation; or
- low quality receiving environment catchments: giving priority to
cleaning up catchments with relatively degraded receiving environments; or
- arterial routes: undertaking work in those catchments that include the
City's high use roads.

Report 3 - Full Version
For a copy of this report or any further information please
contact us.
|